[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bacula-devel] Director bug when using two storage daemons?

Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 08:54:13AM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> By setting up the requirements and configuration the way you have, you've
>> painted yourself into a corner in which two jobs running concurrently must
>> both have exclusive access to a volume, and the only way to satisfy that
>> requirement is to have two volumes mounted, which can in turn only be
>> satisfied by using two SDs.  (If I were doing it, I'd dedicate a
>> separate pool to each SD, and an SD to each job.)
> The more complicated scenario that caused me to start this thread and produce
> the simple test script involved having two different jobs using two different
> pools, sending data to two separate storage daemons.

Then I'm not sure I see the applicability of the simplified
single-daemon test case.  I no longer have the early messages in the
thread, unfortunately.

  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx   alaric@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
Bacula-devel mailing list

This mailing list archive is a service of Copilot Consulting.