[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bacula-devel] Patches

On Monday 27 October 2008 21:48:18 David Boyes wrote:
> > > > free,
> > > > no problem, but i prefere spend my time with new features and bugs
> > > > hunting.
> > >
> > > 2nd option is to package the source diffs into RPM and APT, and
> provide
> > > those via a repository. Applying a diff is a fairly simple
> operation,
> > > and people who care about most recent binaries can do rpmbuild -bb
> on
> > > their own systems easily enough if the source is correctly packaged.
> > >
> > > Coming up with a source patch RPM and APT template isn't rocket
> science,
> > > and it's basic support discipline to not release applications or
> updates
> > > that circumvent the software management system if there is one.
> This approach also gives you prereq control for source updates as well
> as versioning, which is a Very Good Thing for commercial delivery.

Packaging source diffs into RPM and APT packages is really a community issue 
so it will need to be discussed there.  I think they are already doing a lot. 
Other than the Win32 binaries, I don't build any binaires.

Within Bacula Systems, I do not think we will be releaseing source diff RPM 
and APT packages, but rather re-certified binaries, which is part of the 
value added that we want to provide.  To do that requires a certain manpower, 
hence salaries and income to pay the salaries, but I expect we can get there 
rather rapidly.



This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
Bacula-devel mailing list

This mailing list archive is a service of Copilotco.