[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bacula-devel] Selective restore when files are pruned [patch]

On Wednesday 27 August 2008 20:07:05 Martin Simmons wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:40:43 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > On Tuesday 19 August 2008 22:22:38 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > >                                                          If you have
> > > > some other way to add the feature, I would like to hear about it.
> > >
> > > I would probably use bextract for this, which already contains a
> > > partial FD supporting wildcards.
> >
> > The difference with bextract and the need for the patch in question is
> > that bextract works by directly reading the Volume and directly writing
> > the data to the filesystem on which it is running.  There is no comm line
> > in between.
> Yes, that's true.
> > > I think the "partial" status of this FD (and bscan
> > > and bls) is the main reason why I didn't like the idea of making yet
> > > another partial FD in the SD.
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean by "partial status of this FD (and bscan
> > and bls)"
> I was referring to the kinds of stream that they know about, so for example
> you can't bextract Macintosh attributes, ACLs, encrypted data etc.  Bscan
> and bls have similar (though fewer) restrictions.

Yes, bextract and the FD started with different code bases (perhaps similar or 
the same initially).  One day, perhaps we'll make a true library out of the 
restore routines in the FD, then bextact can use it and have the same 
functionality ...


This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
Bacula-devel mailing list

This mailing list archive is a service of Copilotco.