[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bacula-devel] new catalog backup script

Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I suspect that awk would be much more portable on Unix systems.

Yes, but not necessarily the same version of awk, unfortunately.
GNU/Linux tends to have new awk, whereas other, particularly
commercial versions of UNIX (e.g. Solaris) retain the old awk,
because replacing it would break customer scripts (or 3rd party

I frequently have to edit scripts or Makefiles developed on Linux,
and replace "awk" with "nawk" to make them work on Solaris.


> However, it might even be a good idea to write a simple tool for Bacula in 
> C/C++ that will extract the information.  That way, it would be portable to 
> any system including Win32.
>> My opinion: awk will be in the base system of most operating systems.
>> Python might not be.  Both are acceptable to me.

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Bacula-devel mailing list

This mailing list archive is a service of Copilot Consulting.