[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bacula-devel] Feature request: Amazon S3 integration
Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:52:13AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Bacula already requires OS support. It relies heavily upon SCSI
>> interfaces. These interfaces are not designed specifically for
>> Bacula. They are available to all comers.
> I'm aware.
> You suggested a SCSI interface to S3. This sounds wrong on so my
> levels.. A filesystem driver for S3 would be usable, but neither will
> give you any independence. Quite the contrary. You'll become completely
> dependent on systems that provide this interface. This might not be a
> problem, but you started out saying that this was a good way of
> achieving independence.
Umm, my understanding is all systems that Bacula runs upon provide a
Look, please stop trying to poke holes in my specific suggestion and pay
more attention to my general suggestion: namely, pick a solution that is
>> Someone else mentioned: fuse plugin. this looks promising:
>> http://code.google.com/p/s3fs-fuse/ it's obviously linux specific, but
>> should be pretty trivial to set up with bacula
> Quite so. That doesn't help people on systems that don't support FUSE,
> though. I'm not one of them, but I think this would be useful in Bacula
>> Kern also has an idea. See his recent post.
> His idea is a repeat of one of my suggestions, namely teaching Bacula to
> interact directly with S3.
But my understanding is it involves write a driver which confirms to the
API. Much like writing a SCSI interface to S3.
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
Bacula-devel mailing list
This mailing list archive is a service of Copilotco.