Re: [Bacula-devel] [Bacula-users] Beta release of Bacula version 2.2.8

[Frank Sweetser <fs@xxxxxxx>]

Weber, Philip wrote:
> I've fairly recently implemented Bacula on Solaris 9 servers - Director,
> 2 Storage Daemons, 2 tape libraries, MySQL.  I also have a similar test
> environment which I can get up and running fairly quickly.
> 
> Should I be running the regression tests either for my own upgrade
> testing or for the benefit of the community?  If so, where do I start?

It's always a good idea to run regression tests =)  You should note, however, 
that the contention issues that Kern mentioned are quite difficult to hit in 
the regression suites.  I was able to hit the contention issue a few times a 
week in my configuration (two tape drives off a single autochanger, about 20 
clients), but not in the regression suite.

The regression suite is actually pretty easy to get started with.  Directions 
are in the developer's manual:

http://bacula.org/developers/Bacula_Regression_Testing.html

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
     GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel